Microsoft shipped four Bing and Copilot changes in June, and I'd bet your SEO team hasn't looked at any of them, because most teams haven't. If you want a measure of how little attention Bing gets, the Chrome extension Microsoft launched on June 6 had six installs on its first day.
I think ignoring it is a mistake. Bing holds around 17% of US desktop search according to StatCounter, and its index matters more than that share suggests. Copilot and Perplexity both pull from it. So do Yahoo and DuckDuckGo, and even Ecosia. These updates could shift citation share for the rest of the year, and the one Bing story that did travel, a June 1 spike, was misleading.
Web IQ enters public preview on June 2
I'd rank this one last for most marketing teams, though developers would probably rank it first. At Build 2026, Microsoft moved Web IQ out of private beta and into public preview. It's the grounding API Copilot and third-party assistants use to pull real-time web data into answers.
Microsoft's benchmarks put it at 164 milliseconds p95 latency. That's roughly 2.5 times faster than alternative grounding APIs, and while pricing is still waitlist-gated, the pitch is plain: Web IQ as the neutral grounding backbone for any assistant that wants factual retrieval under 200 milliseconds.
Should you care about an API you'll probably never call? Only if you build on Copilot's ecosystem or an assistant that grounds on Bing, because then Web IQ decides whether your page makes it into a response inside the response-time budget.
The kill switch nobody installed
This one made me laugh. Between June 4 and June 6, Bing shipped an AI opt-out at the query level: add -ai to any Bing search and the AI Overviews disappear entirely, or install a Chrome and Edge extension that flips the setting permanently.
Jordi Ribas announced the extension on June 5, and day one brought six installs. That tells you the organic demand for anti-AI search is mostly talk, which surprised me, given how constantly Google and Meta users complain about AI.
What the feature says about Microsoft matters more to you. A search engine that lets people turn AI off suggests a product team that still believes blue-link traffic matters, which is the reverse of Google's forced-AI stance. That leaves room for your content to rank well in Bing organic and earn traffic without ever winning the Copilot grounding layer.
Big news from Bing. And you can compare changes over time. This is what @kmadhavan77 shared in April and now it's rolling out -> New AI Visibility Insights in Bing Webmaster Tools: Intents, Topics, Citation Share, Compare "AI-generated answers are dynamic, contextual, and often https://t.co/r3rU0acluY
Glenn Gabe@glenngabeJun 16, 2026
Built by the team that got cited in 48 hours.
Content generation, backlink building, AI visibility tracking, and Google rankings. One platform, zero guesswork.
Bing WMT ships Intents, Topics, Citation Share and Compare
If you open one thing from June, make it this. On June 16 the AI Performance Report preview went out to every Bing Webmaster Tools account globally, with four new views: Intents, Topics, Citation Share and Compare.
I'd start with Citation Share. For a given topic it shows what percentage of Copilot citations your domain earns against competing domains, and Compare turns that into a benchmark where you drop three or four competitor domains into a table. The other two look inward. Intents shows the queries that triggered Copilot citations of your pages, and Topics groups those citations into clusters, so you can see where your domain has content-market fit inside Copilot.
Krishna Madhavan, the Microsoft PM who runs Bing Webmaster Tools, called it the first first-party AI citation dashboard from any major search engine. He runs the product, so of course he'd say so, but I think the claim holds. Search Console doesn't surface AI Overview citation data at this level of detail, and Perplexity and OpenAI don't have an equivalent dashboard at all.
Bing Webmaster Tools updates AI reporting with Intents, Topics, Citation Share and Compare
Thanks to u/rustybrick for sharing: Topics: The Topics in the AI performance reports group related grounding queries into broader thematic clusters. AI systems reason across concepts and themes rather than isolated keywords, Microsoft expla...
For a practitioner's walk-through of each view, read that r/SEO thread from launch day. People there mostly agree the tool is real and the data directional but useful, and they'd have you verify your Bing Webmaster Tools access this week.
The backfill trap that fooled everyone
If your Bing plan is built on the June 1 chart, throw it out. That was the date of the widely reported "Bing impression spike," which grew into a story about Bing suddenly becoming important. Multiple SEO agencies wrote case studies on it and newsletter roundups picked those up, and all of them had it wrong.
Krishna Madhavan set the record straight on X in early July. While preparing the AI Performance Report, Microsoft had loaded roughly 90 days of previously uncounted impression data into Bing Webmaster Tools accounts, and the chart showed that retroactive fill as if it were a live jump. A strategy built on the spike is aimed at traffic that never arrived.
I'd anchor everything to June 16 instead, the day the AI Performance Report launched and something actually changed. Take your before-and-after Citation Share numbers from that date and start the next 90 days of measurement there.
See your first AI citation report in under 5 minutes.
No setup calls. No onboarding meetings. Connect your domain and see where AI mentions your brand right now.

The 3.1% / 35% paradox
PipeRocket's numbers are the reason you should care if you sell to businesses. Their study, run this year across 53 B2B brands, measured AI referral traffic on every platform. Copilot drove just 3.1% of it, and on volume alone you'd skip it.
Then look at conversion. Copilot's lead-to-SQL rate in the same study was 35%, the highest of any AI platform tracked. That's roughly three to four times the average across ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity.
I think of it as shortlist traffic. A buyer on enterprise Copilot for Microsoft 365 is already logged into the company's procurement workflows when they ask. So when Copilot recommends a vendor, adding it to the evaluation shortlist is one click away inside the same tenant, with no switch to another browser tab. The referral converts because the buyer was already at the decision surface.
That makes Copilot's traffic low in volume and extreme in quality. Until June you had no way to see your share of it, and the WMT AI Performance Report is the first tool that lets your team measure it.
The 🔥 SEO & AI Search News of the Week [From #SEOFOMO - June 21, 2026] 👇 1. Microsoft rolls out New AI Visibility Insights in Bing Webmaster Tools: Intents, Topics, Citation Share, Compare 2. Google Cloud Announces The Open Knowledge Format 3. Google: LLMS.txt Files Won't https://t.co/g8pKgI3QLc
Aleyda Solis 🕊️@aleydaJun 21, 2026Bing AI Performance Report Use Cases
Bing's AI performance report definitely shows data from Co-pilot and maybe (I have no idea for certain) some data from ChatGPT usage. Is anyone actually using this in some way? are you reporting on it? It seems like the only native AI visib...
What this means for July
I'd make three moves before August.
First, log into Bing Webmaster Tools and turn on the AI Performance Report if you haven't. It's free and takes under 15 minutes to set up, and the history reaches back 90 days. Our AI visibility tracker covers ChatGPT, Perplexity and four more engines, so your Bing Citation Share can sit next to those numbers.
Then check that IndexNow really works on your site. Microsoft's June disclosures credit it with 22% of Bing search clicks, and at the start of the year that figure was 15%. Google still doesn't support the protocol, which is exactly why Google-heavy SEO teams underrate it. Nothing gets new URLs into Copilot's grounding index faster, and setup is a WordPress plugin install or one POST request per URL.
The last move is the one people skip: pull your Bing organic rank for your top twenty target queries. Inside the top ten, you're likely earning Copilot citation share already. Outside it, I don't think any AI-specific optimization will fix that. Our content engine writes new pages in the answer-first shape citation layers lift, and our pricing page has the full cross-engine stack.
Bing won't eclipse Google this year, and you don't need it to. One month brought four changes, including a citation dashboard nobody else offers, and the referrals that do come through convert at 35%, so I'd spend the two hours of setup it takes to measure your share.
Your competitors are building backlinks while you read this.
Organic outreach, social mentions, and link exchanges, with managed backlinks available as an add-on. Grow your domain authority without running the campaign yourself.

FAQ
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| What did Microsoft ship for Bing and Copilot in June 2026? | Four things: Web IQ in public preview (June 2, 164ms p95, roughly 2.5x faster than alternatives), the -ai kill switch and Chrome/Edge extension (June 4-6), Facebook AI Mode worldwide (June 15), and the Bing Webmaster Tools Intents, Topics, Citation Share and Compare preview (June 16) |
| What is Bing Webmaster Tools Citation Share? | The percentage of Copilot citations your domain earns for a topic against competing domains, which Krishna Madhavan calls the first first-party AI citation dashboard from any major search engine |
| Did Bing traffic actually spike in early June 2026? | No. The June 1 spike was backfilled historical data, as Krishna Madhavan confirmed on X in early July |
| Why is Copilot considered underrated for B2B traffic? | It sends 3.1% of AI referral traffic but converts 35% of leads to SQLs, the best of any AI platform in PipeRocket's 2026 study of 53 B2B brands |
| What's IndexNow's role in the June 2026 update? | It drives 22% of Bing search clicks (up from 15% in early 2026), and Google still doesn't support it |











